I Stopped Believing Everyone Can Write the Website

Digital Architecture & Strategy

I Stopped Believing Everyone Can Write the Website

Why the most beautiful designs stall in the digital graveyard of shared documents.

The radiator in the corner of the office doesn’t just hiss; it clicks with a metallic, irregular rhythm, like a cooling engine or a clock that can’t quite decide what second it is. It is the only sound in the room besides the soft, wet slap of a damp cloth against a plastic bucket.

I’ve spent most of my life working with sand, where the texture is everything. If the grains are too dry, the arch collapses before it’s even begun. If they’re too wet, the whole structure slumps into a sad, heavy pile of mud. You learn quickly that the “stuff” you’re building with is more important than the tools you’re holding.

01

The Museum of Modern Interfaces

I yawned yesterday during a status call with a client. It was an accident-the kind of deep, jaw-stretching yawn that happens when your brain realizes it’s been hearing the same five sentences for . It wasn’t that the project was boring. The project was actually quite beautiful.

The designs were approved in . Pixel-perfect, high-fidelity Figma files that looked like they belonged in a museum of modern interface design. Sleek lines, clever interactions, and a color palette that felt like a crisp autumn morning. It is now . The site is not live.

Design Finished

March

Current State

October

02

The Google Doc Graveyard

The reason the site is not live is currently sitting in a shared Google Doc that was last edited . I opened it during that call. On page four, under a bold heading that says ‘How It Works,’ there is a single, lonely line of text:

“TODO – Marcus to expand, need the enterprise angle here.”

– THE DOCUMENT GHOST

Marcus left the company in . Below that line, there are seven comments from four different people. They are all agreeing with each other. “Yes, Marcus needs to flesh this out,” one says. “We should make sure we mention the scalability here,” says another.

The comment thread is now three times longer than the paragraph Marcus never wrote. This document is a graveyard of intentions, a digital monument to the “Generalist Trap.”

I used to be wrong about this. I spent years in the agency world believing that the design was the bottleneck. I thought if we could just get the “look” right, the rest would follow. I assumed that because everyone in a corporate office knows how to send an email or draft a memo, they are fundamentally capable of writing the “words” for a new website.

I was wrong. I was catastrophically, expensive-level wrong. I thought of copy as the filler, the sand inside the mold, rather than the water that actually gives the structure its strength.

Why does a million-dollar brand identity die inside a Google Doc?

1. The invisibility of the deliverable.

When you hire an agency, there are line items for “Design” and “SEO.” But “Copy” is a floating expectation. It is the ghost in the machine.

2. The fallacy of universal skill.

We don’t assume the marketing manager can write custom CSS, but we assume everyone can write a “How It Works” section. This is like assuming everyone who eats food can run a professional kitchen.

3. The fear of the blank page.

Writing requires vulnerability. To write a paragraph is to make a choice, and making a choice means being wrong. Comments are safer than sentences.

The Structural Integrity of Copy

In my world of sand sculpting, we have a term for the structural integrity of a build. We call it the “critical moisture point.” If you miss that point, the sand stays as a pile. In the digital world, the copy is that moisture. Without it, the design is just a dry, fragile shell.

We treat the Content Management System-or CMS, which is essentially the digital filing cabinet where your words live once they escape the chaos of a shared doc-as a place to dump “stuff” later. But a CMS without content is just an empty house.

$80,000 Design

3 Hours of Writing

The disproportionate gap: Companies spend thousands on the shell, but stall on the engine.

It is a strange phenomenon to watch a company spend $80,000 on a redesign and then stall for half a year because nobody wants to spend three hours writing eleven pages of copy. The agency becomes the scapegoat. In the client’s memory, the “redesign took a year.” They forget that the agency finished their work in .

I find myself thinking about Marcus. I don’t know him, but I feel like I do. He was probably the guy who “was good with words.” Every company has one. He was the one who could turn a dry technical spec into something that sounded almost human.

And because Marcus was there, everyone else felt they didn’t have to be. When he left, the “writing” didn’t get reassigned; it just stayed in his ghost-hands.

There is a specific kind of frustration that comes with being an expert in a specialized field-like Webflow development or full-stack engineering-and realizing that your entire output is being held hostage by a lack of nouns and verbs. I’ve seen developers at a place like

Coherent Agency

build incredible, animated, high-performance engines, only to have them sit in a staging environment gathering digital dust because the “About Us” page is still a grey box with “Lorem Ipsum” scrolling through it.

🏎️

It feels like building a Ferrari and then realizing nobody remembered to buy the gasoline.

The Luxury Watchmaker’s Ghost

I remember a project where I made the same mistake. I was consulting on a brand refresh for a luxury watchmaker. The design was stunning-deep charcoals, gold accents, photography that made you feel like you could smell the leather straps.

We were from the supposed launch date when I realized we didn’t have a single sentence for the “Craftsmanship” page. I stayed up until trying to write it myself, and I failed.

“I’m a sand sculptor. I know how to talk about the grain size of silica, but I don’t know how to sell a $12,000 chronograph.”

I ended up calling the client and admitting we were stuck. They were shocked. “But we gave you the brochures!” they said. A brochure is not a website. A shared doc is not a narrative. This is the hidden tax of the digital age: the assumption that because tools are easier to use, the thinking behind them is easier to do.

Naming the Ghost

The radiator has stopped clicking now. The office is silent, and the “Marcus” doc is still open on my second monitor. I think about the since the last edit. What happened on that eleventh day?

Someone probably opened it, saw the “TODO,” felt a brief flash of guilt, and then closed the tab to answer an email. To break this cycle, you have to name the ghost. You have to take the “General” work and make it “Specialized.”

I’ve started telling clients that I won’t start a build until the copy is 80% locked. They hate it. They tell me they’ll “get it to me during the dev phase.” I tell them no.

I tell them about Marcus. I tell them about the seven months of status calls and the yawn that I couldn’t hide. I tell them that a website is a conversation, and you can’t design a conversation if you don’t know what you’re going to say.

The Voice is the Most Human Part

We need to stop treating the most human part of our digital presence-our voice-as the one thing we can automate or ignore. The agency isn’t the reason the project took a year. The “TODO” note is. The belief that “we’ll get to it later” is.

If you’re sitting on a redesign that’s been “almost done” since the spring, look at your shared docs. Find the Marcus in your organization. If he’s gone, or if he’s too busy, or if he’s just tired of being the only one who cares about the enterprise angle, then do the one thing no one wants to do: hire a writer.

FINAL VERDICT

Stop pretending that the design is what’s holding you back.

The sand is dry. It’s time to add some water. Or maybe just close the doc and realize that if it hasn’t been written in seven months, it probably isn’t going to be written by “someone” this week. It needs a name. It needs a person. It needs to stop being a ghost.